4.5 Editorial Material

Infantile Macrocephaly: Complicated Familial Benign Enlargement of Subarachnoid Space in Twins of Suspected Nonaccidental Injury

期刊

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 67-68

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.09.134

关键词

Benign enlargement of subarachnoid space; Neuroradiology/imaging; Nonaccidental injury; Pediatrics; Shaken baby syndrome; Subdural hematoma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 3-month-old male twin with increasing head circumference and a subdural hemorrhage was successfully treated with bilateral drainage and a shunt, while his twin sibling with similar symptoms was managed conservatively and showed improvement. Both twins remained neurologically stable with enlarged head circumference at a 2-year follow-up.
A 3-month-old first of dizygotic male twins, born at 34 + 5 weeks gestational age, presented with a 4-week history of increasing head circumference and vomiting. He had a tense anterior fontanelle and a head circumference above the 97th percentile. Magnetic resonance imaging showed large bilateral subdural collection with hemosiderin deposits suggestive of hemorrhage. Nine days of bilateral subdural drainage reduced the collection size and blood load. On postoperative day 16, magnetic resonance imaging confirmed persistent but smaller subdural collections, unmasking the underlying subarachnoid space enlargement. On day 18, a right subdural-peritoneal valveless shunt was inserted as definitive treatment. As part of a nonaccidental injury investigation, Twin 2 was also found to have macrocephaly secondary to benign enlargement of subarachnoid space, which was managed conservatively. Benign enlargement of subarachnoid space has an assumed autosomal/multifactorial inheritance and predisposes to subdural hemorrhage. Ultimately, no safeguarding issues were raised. Both twins continued to be neurologically stable at 2-year follow-up with head circumferences between the 98th and 99th percentiles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据