4.5 Article

Experimental and analytical study on shear behavior of strain-hardening cementitious composite beams reinforced with fiber-reinforced polymer bars

期刊

STRUCTURAL CONCRETE
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 1080-1099

出版社

ERNST & SOHN
DOI: 10.1002/suco.202100544

关键词

ductility; failure mode; fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcement; shear strength; simplified truss-strut model; strain-hardening cementitious composite (SHCC)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778131]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that FRP-reinforced SHCC beams have higher shear carrying capacity and better ductility through four-point bending tests. The shear span to effective depth ratio and stirrup ratio have significant effects on the shear behavior of FRP-reinforced SHCC beams.
Application of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcement in concrete beams may cause large deflection and crack width, as well as low shear capacity and ductility due to relatively small stiffness of FRP materials. To avoid these unfavorable factors and evaluate the shear behavior of FRP-reinforced structural members, a high-performance strain-hardening cementitious composite (SHCC) is introduced to substitute conventional concrete in reinforced beams, and four-point bending test is conducted in this study. Six FRP-reinforced SHCC beams with different transverse reinforcement ratios and shear spans, as well as one concrete reference beam, were tested. According to the test results, the FRP-reinforced SHCC beam showed enhanced shear carrying capacity and superior ductility compared with the concrete beams. The shear span to effective depth ratio as well as the stirrup ratio has a great influence on the shear behavior of FRP-reinforced SHCC beams, including the failure mode, load-carrying capacity, crack propagation, and ductility. Finally, a simplified truss-strut model for predicting shear carrying capacity of steel or FRP-reinforced SHCC beams is proposed, and a good agreement is achieved with the experimental results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据