4.7 Article

Comparative genomic study on the complete plastomes of four officinal Ardisia species in China

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01561-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81903741]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ardisia plants are naturally distributed in tropical and subtropical areas, with edible and medicinal values. The chloroplast genomes of four Ardisia species were sequenced and analyzed, showing conservative gene content and low sequence divergence. The study provides useful information for taxonomic differences, molecular identification, and phylogenetic relationships of Ardisia plants.
Ardisia Sw. (Primulaceae) is naturally distributed in tropical and subtropical areas. Most of them possess edible and medicinal values and are popular in clinical and daily use in China. However, ambiguous species delineation and genetic information limit the development and utilization of this genus. In this study, the chloroplast genomes of four Ardisia species, namely A. gigantifolia Stapf, A. crenata Sims, A. villosa Roxb. and A. mamillata Hance, were sequenced, annotated, and analyzed comparatively. All the four chloroplast genomes possess a typical quadripartite structure, and each of the genomes is about 156 Kb in size. The structure and gene content of the Ardisia plastomes were conservative and showed low sequence divergence. Furthermore, we identified five mutation hotspots as candidate DNA barcodes for Ardisia, namely, trnT-psbD, ndhF-rpl32, rpl32-ccsA, ccsA-ndhD and ycf1. Phylogenetic analysis based on the whole-chloroplast genomes data showed that Ardisia was sister to Tapeinosperma Hook. f. In addition, the results revealed a great topological profile of Ardisia's with strong support values, which matches their geographical distribution patterns. Summarily, our results provide useful information for investigations on taxonomic differences, molecular identification, and phylogenetic relationships of Ardisia plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据