4.7 Article

Cardiac troponin I and T for ruling out coronary artery disease in suspected chronic coronary syndrome

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-04850-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the performance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I and T in diagnosing obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome. It found that hs-cTnI had superior performance compared to hs-cTnT and that the diagnostic performance was best in patients with low cardiovascular risk.
To compare the performance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I and T (hs-cTnI; hs-cTnT) in diagnosing obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD(50)) in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). A total of 706 patients with suspected CCS, referred for Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, were included. cTn concentrations were measured using the Singulex hs-cTnI (limit of detection [LoD] 0.08 ng/L) and Roche hs-cTnT (LoD 3 ng/L) assays. Obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD(50)) was defined as >= 50% coronary stenosis. Cardiovascular risk was determined by the NORRISK2-score. Median age of the patients was 65 (range 28-87) years, 35% were women. All patients had hs-cTnI concentrations above the LoD (median 1.9 [Q1-3 1.2-3.6] ng/L), 72% had hs-cTnT above the LoD (median 5 [Q1-3 2-11] ng/L). There was a graded relationship between hs-cTn concentrations and coronary artery calcium. Only hs-cTnI remained associated with CAD(50) in adjusted analyses (OR 1.20 95% Confidence Interval [1.05-1.38]), p = 0.009). The C-statistics for hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT were 0.65 (95% CI [0.60-0.69]) and 0.60 (0.56-0.64). The highest specificity and negative predictive values for CAD(50) were in the lowest NORRISK2-tertile. hs-cTn concentrations provide diagnostic information in patients with suspected CCS, with superior performance of hs-cTnI compared to hs-cTnT in regard to CAD(50). The diagnostic performance appeared best in those with low cardiovascular risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据