4.7 Article

Diagnostic and prognostic value of FDG PET-CT in patients with suspected recurrent thymic epithelial tumors

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00003-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81501513]
  2. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Initiative for Innovative Medicine (CAMS-I2M) [2017-I2M-1-001]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0901500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the diagnostic and prognostic value of FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected recurrent TETs. The results showed that FDG PET/CT had high sensitivity and good specificity in detecting recurrence, and it had important prognostic value in assessing the risk of disease progression.
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected recurrent thymic epithelial tumors (TETs). We retrospectively reviewed 83 patients with histopathologically proven TETs (50 thymomas; 33 thymic carcinomas) who underwent FDG PET/CT after surgery. The sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET/CT in detecting recurrence were calculated. The progression-free survival rate (PFS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. FDG PET/CT results were positive in 50 patients and negative in 33. Recurrent TETs were confirmed in 40 of 50 patients with positive PET/CT findings. The sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET/CT were 100% and 76.7%, respectively. Disease progression occurred in 28 patients during the follow-up. FDG PET/CT showed added prognostic value over the Masaoka stage and histopathology. Among patients with the same Masaoka stage, negative PET/CT was significantly associated with better PFS (P < 0.001). Similarly, among patients with the same histopathology, negative PET/CT was also associated with a significantly longer PFS (P < 0.001). FDG PET/CT demonstrated a good diagnostic performance in patients with recurrent TETs and had an important prognostic value in assessing the risk of disease progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据