4.7 Article

Estimating and predicting snakebite risk in the Terai region of Nepal through a high-resolution geospatial and One Health approach

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03301-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [315130_176271]
  2. MSF (Medecins sans Frontieres/Doctors without Borders)
  3. Fondation Louis Jeantet
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [315130_176271] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research highlights poverty as a fundamental factor increasing snakebite risk in Nepal, while the minimum temperature of the coldest month significantly influences the risk for animals. Identification of risk hotspots along the Terai helps estimate the population exposed to different probability risk thresholds within a year. Such analyses and findings could be applied in other countries and diseases.
Most efforts to understand snakebite burden in Nepal have been localized to relatively small areas and focused on humans through epidemiological studies. We present the outcomes of a geospatial analysis of the factors influencing snakebite risk in humans and animals, based on both a national-scale multi-cluster random survey and, environmental, climatic, and socio-economic gridded data for the Terai region of Nepal. The resulting Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation models highlight the importance of poverty as a fundamental risk-increasing factor, augmenting the snakebite odds in humans by 63.9 times. For animals, the minimum temperature of the coldest month was the most influential covariate, increasing the snakebite odds 23.4 times. Several risk hotspots were identified along the Terai, helping to visualize at multiple administrative levels the estimated population numbers exposed to different probability risk thresholds in 1 year. These analyses and findings could be replicable in other countries and for other diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据