4.7 Article

Association between choriocapillaris flow deficit and choroidal neovascularization activity in eyes with myopic choroidal neovascularization

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01557-z

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the relationship between choriocapillaris flow deficit (CFD) and high myopia-related choroidal neovascularization (CNV), finding that the size of CFD and CNV flow signal area are useful indicators of CNV activity, helping to determine treatment timing. The results suggest that both CFD area and CNV flow signal size play a significant role in assessing CNV activity in eyes with myopic CNV.
Although choriocapillaris flow deficit (CFD) around choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is less associated with CNV activity in myopic eyes, no reports are investigating its size as an indicator of CNV activity. We investigated the relationship between CFD and high myopia-related CNV. In this retrospective, observational study, patients underwent optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) with split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography for diagnosing pathological myopic CNV (mCNV); CFD features around CNV margins were evaluated. Of the 33 eyes (30 patients), 11 (33.3%) had active mCNV, and 22 (66.7%) had inactive CNV. Six eyes (18.2%) were treatment-naive, while the remainder previously underwent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. On OCTA, blood flow signals were detected in CNV in the outer retinal layer in 28 (84.8%) eyes, including all active cases (11 cases) and 17 (77.3%) of 22 inactive cases. CNV flow signal size correlated significantly with activity (P < 0.001). CFD around CNV was observed in 24 eyes (72.7%), including all active cases (11 cases) and 13 (59.1%) of 22 inactive cases. CFD size correlated significantly with CNV activity (P < 0.001). The size of both the CFD area around CNV and CNV flow signal area are useful indicators of CNV activity in eyes with mCNV, which may help determine treatment timing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据