4.7 Article

Increased rates of dispersal of free-ranging cane toads (Rhinella marina) during their global invasion

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02828-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [FL120100074]
  2. Australian Research Council [FL120100074] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As invasions progress over time, rates of population spread accelerate as individual organisms' dispersal behavior shifts, resulting in greater distances covered. Research on cane toads has shown that they are relatively sedentary in their native range and some invaded areas, but become more active in tropical Australia, covering longer distances as they disperse. This change in dispersal behavior, characterized by increased movements and changes in retreat sites, evolved earlier than other movement behaviors in response to breakdowns in philopatry.
Invasions often accelerate through time, as dispersal-enhancing traits accumulate at the expanding range edge. How does the dispersal behaviour of individual organisms shift to increase rates of population spread? We collate data from 44 radio-tracking studies (in total, of 650 animals) of cane toads (Rhinella marina) to quantify distances moved per day, and the frequency of displacement in their native range (French Guiana) and two invaded areas (Hawai'i and Australia). We show that toads in their native-range, Hawai'i and eastern Australia are relatively sedentary, while toads dispersing across tropical Australia increased their daily distances travelled from 20 to 200 m per day. That increase reflects an increasing propensity to change diurnal retreat sites every day, as well as to move further during each nocturnal displacement. Daily changes in retreat site evolved earlier than did changes in distances moved per night, indicating a breakdown in philopatry before other movement behaviours were optimised to maximise dispersal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据