4.7 Article

A potent truncated form of human soluble CR1 is protective in a mouse model of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01423-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. CSL Ltd., Parkville, Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compared the effects of two complement inhibitors, CSL040 and full-length sHuCR1, in a mouse model of warm renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. CSL040 demonstrated a significant reduction in renal dysfunction and organ damage in a dose-dependent manner, showing promise as a therapeutic candidate to attenuate renal IRI.
The complement system is a potent mediator of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), which detrimentally affects the function and survival of transplanted kidneys. Human complement receptor 1 (HuCR1) is an integral membrane protein that inhibits complement activation by blocking the convertases that activate C3 and C5. We have previously reported that CSL040, a truncated form of recombinant soluble HuCR1 (sHuCR1), has enhanced complement inhibitory activity and improved pharmacokinetic properties compared to the parent molecule. Here, we compared the capacity of CSL040 and full-length sHuCR1 to suppress complement-mediated organ damage in a mouse model of warm renal IRI. Mice were treated with two doses of CSL040 or sHuCR1, given 1 h prior to 22 min unilateral renal ischemia and again 3 h later. 24 h after reperfusion, mice treated with CSL040 were protected against warm renal IRI in a dose-dependent manner, with the highest dose of 60 mg/kg significantly reducing renal dysfunction, tubular injury, complement activation, endothelial damage, and leukocyte infiltration. In contrast, treatment with sHuCR1 at a molar equivalent dose to 60 mg/kg CSL040 did not confer significant protection. Our results identify CSL040 as a promising therapeutic candidate to attenuate renal IRI and demonstrate its superior efficacy over full-length sHuCR1 in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据