4.7 Article

Ex vivo efficacy of gemifloxacin in experimental keratitis induced by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.06.026

关键词

Antibiotic resistance; Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Gemifloxacin; In vitro antibacterial activity; Ex vivo keratitis model; Dose-response effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, the emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains has been observed in ocular infections. Resistance of MRSA to second- and third-generation fluoroquinolones has increased interest in the fourth-generation fluoroquinolones. In this study, the antibacterial activity of gemifloxacin against MRSA ocular isolates in vitro and in a modified ex vivo rabbit keratitis model was investigated. In vitro susceptibility test results indicated that the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of gemifloxacin were lower than the MICs of other fluoroquinolones, including moxifloxacin (MIC50 range, 0.016-0.032 mu g/mL; MIC90 range, 0.047-0.094 mu g/mL). Results from the ex vivo keratitis model showed a statistically significant decrease in MRSA counts (0.5-2 log(10) CFU/g; P < 0.05) in corneas treated with 0.3% gemifloxacin every 30 min for 7 h. Moreover, the dose-response effect of different concentrations of gemifloxacin (3-3000 mu g/mL) demonstrated that a dose of 30 mu g/mL had the same efficacy as the highest dose of 3000 mu g/mL against all S. aureus strains. Possibly, gemifloxacin reached a steady-state level in the cornea, as the fourth-generation fluoroquinolones have better anterior chamber penetration. This study demonstrated that 0.3% gemifloxacin ophthalmic solution may be an effective topical therapy for the treatment of MRSA keratitis. In addition, this reproducible, ethical and economic ex vivo infection model can be used as a mechanistically-based alternative to in vivo animal testing, bridging the gap between in vitro and in vivo results. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. and International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据