4.7 Article

Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of a pre-exposure prophylaxis program for HIV prevention for men who have sex with men in Japan

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07116-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS [20H05042, 19H04839]
  2. AMED CREST [19gm1310002]
  3. AMED Japan Program for Infectious Diseases Research and Infrastructure [20wm0325007h0001, 20wm0325004s0201, 20wm0325012s0301, 20wm0325015s0301]
  4. AMED Research Program on HIV/AIDS [19fk0410023s0101]
  5. AMED Research Program on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases [19fk0108050h0003, 19fk0108156h0001, 20fk0108140s0801, 20fk0108413s0301]
  6. Moonshot RD Grant [JPMJMS2021, JPMJMS2025]
  7. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan [H29-AIDS-009]
  8. JST MIRAI
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20H05042, 19H04839] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The introduction of PrEP into the HIV prevention program for MSM in Japan is cost-effective. Using a Markov model and sensitivity analysis, the study found that the PrEP program has advantages in controlling HIV transmission and reducing treatment costs, and cheaper PrEP drugs can improve the cost-effectiveness of the program.
Men who have sex with men (MSM) have been disproportionally affected by the HIV epidemic in many countries, including Japan. Although pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a strong prevention tool, it is not yet approved in Japan. A Markov model was developed to describe HIV infection and disease progression in an MSM cohort (N = 1000) in Japan receiving a PrEP program. The model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a PrEP program. HIV/AIDS treatment, screening, hospitalization due to AIDS, and PrEP were considered as costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained as utilities. Cost-effectiveness was assessed by comparing the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over a 30-year period against the willingness to pay (WTP) threshold. One-way sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. With 50% PrEP coverage, the PrEP program became dominant against the program without PrEP, using a threshold of 5.0 million JPY/QALY (45,455 USD). The probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that the PrEP program was dominant or at least cost-effective in most cases of 10,000 simulations. Therefore, preparing cheaper PrEP pills, which results in PrEP being dominant or ICER being lower than the WTP threshold, is important to make the program cost-effective. Introduction of PrEP to an MSM cohort in Japan would be cost-effective over a 30-year time horizon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据