4.7 Article

NB-LRR-encoding genes conferring susceptibility to organophosphate pesticides in sorghum

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98908-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [17H03699, 18K19343, 21H02508]
  2. Oohara Foundation
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K19343, 21H02508, 17H03699] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through QTL analysis in sorghum, a prominent QTL on chromosome 5 was identified to be associated with organophosphate sensitivity (OPS), potentially due to a dominant mutation in the NLR-C gene. The finding of OPS as a dominant trait is crucial for understanding the functional role of NB-LRR proteins in cereals and ensuring sorghum breeding free from OPS.
Organophosphate is the commonly used pesticide to control pest outbreak, such as those by aphids in many crops. Despite its wide use, however, necrotic lesion and/or cell death following the application of organophosphate pesticides has been reported to occur in several species. To understand this phenomenon, called organophosphate pesticide sensitivity (OPS) in sorghum, we conducted QTL analysis in a recombinant inbred line derived from the Japanese cultivar NOG, which exhibits OPS. Mapping OPS in this population identified a prominent QTL on chromosome 5, which corresponded to Organophosphate-Sensitive Reaction (OSR) reported previously in other mapping populations. The OSR locus included a cluster of three genes potentially encoding nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NB-LRR, NLR) proteins, among which NLR-C was considered to be responsible for OPS in a dominant fashion. NLR-C was functional in NOG, whereas the other resistant parent, BTx623, had a null mutation caused by the deletion of promoter sequences. Our finding of OSR as a dominant trait is important not only in understanding the diversified role of NB-LRR proteins in cereals but also in securing sorghum breeding free from OPS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据