Usefulness of arterial spin labeling perfusion as an initial evaluation of status epilepticus

This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and prognostic value of arterial spin labeling (ASL) in a large group of status epilepticus (SE) patients and compare them with those of other magnetic resonance (MR) sequences, including dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion imaging. We retrospectively collected data of patients with SE in a tertiary center between September 2016 and March 2020. MR images were visually assessed, and the sensitivity for the detection of SE and prognostication was compared among multi-delay ASL, DSC, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). We included 51 SE patients and 46 patients with self-limiting seizures for comparison. Relevant changes in ASL were observed in 90.2% (46/51) of SE patients, a percentage higher than those for DSC, FLAIR, and DWI. ASL was the most sensitive method for initial differentiation between SE and self-limiting seizures. The sensitivity of ASL for detecting refractory SE (89.5%) or estimating poor outcomes (100%) was higher than those of other MR protocols or electroencephalography and comparable to those of clinical prognostic scores, although the specificity of ASL was very low as 9.4% and 15.6%, respectively. ASL showed a better ability to detect SE and predict the prognosis than other MR sequences, therefore it can be valuable for the initial evaluation of patients with SE.

Automated summary

This study evaluated the sensitivity and prognostic value of arterial spin labeling (ASL) in a large group of status epilepticus (SE) patients, finding that ASL was more sensitive in detecting SE and predicting outcomes compared to other MR sequences. ASL showed a higher sensitivity for identifying refractory SE and estimating poor outcomes, making it a valuable tool for the initial evaluation of SE patients.