4.7 Article

Dasatinib plus quercetin attenuates some frailty characteristics in SAMP10 mice

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06448-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [18dk0207027h0003]
  2. Suzuken Memorial Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination therapy of dasatinib and quercetin was found to improve frailty characteristics, motor and cognitive function, and reduce senescence in the hippocampus in SAMP10 mice. These results suggest that senolytic therapy may have protective effects against frailty.
Senolytics are a class of drugs that selectively remove senescent cells. Dasatinib and quercetin have been discovered, and their combination has shown various anti-ageing effects. The SAMP10 mouse strain is a model of brain ageing. Here, we investigated the effect of combination on frailty characteristics in SAMP10. By comparing SAMP10 with SAMR1 mice as normal ageing controls, we investigated some frailty characteristics. Frailty was assessed at 18-38 weeks of age with a clinical frailty index. Motor and cognitive function of these mice were evaluated using behavioral experiments. SAMP10 mice were divided into vehicle and combination, and these functions and histological changes in the brain hippocampus were investigated. Finally, the in vitro effects of combination on oxidative stress-induced senescent muscle and neuronal cells were investigated. As a result, we found that frailty index was higher in SAMP10 than SAMR1. Motor and cognitive function were worse in SAMP10 than SAMR1. Furthermore, combination therapy improved frailty, motor and cognitive function, and the senescent phenotype of the hippocampus compared with vehicle in SAMP10. In summary, SAMP10 showed more marked frailty characteristics than SAMR1, and dasatinib and quercetin attenuated them in SAMP10. From our results, senolytic therapy might contribute protective effects against frailty.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据