4.7 Article

Prime factorization using quantum variational imaginary time evolution

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00339-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1955907]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, National Quantum Information Science Research Centers, Quantum Science Center
  3. US Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  4. DOE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The road to quantum computing has been accelerated by the promises of Shor's algorithm, but has not yet been realized due to noisy qubits and lack of robust error correction schemes. An alternative method using variational imaginary time evolution is explored, showing promise for prime factorization. This method scales circuits based on the bit-length of the number and circuit depth, successfully factoring numbers greater than previously achieved on IBMQ hardware.
The road to computing on quantum devices has been accelerated by the promises that come from using Shor's algorithm to reduce the complexity of prime factorization. However, this promise hast not yet been realized due to noisy qubits and lack of robust error correction schemes. Here we explore a promising, alternative method for prime factorization that uses well-established techniques from variational imaginary time evolution. We create a Hamiltonian whose ground state encodes the solution to the problem and use variational techniques to evolve a state iteratively towards these prime factors. We show that the number of circuits evaluated in each iteration scales as O(n(5)d), where n is the bit-length of the number to be factorized and d is the depth of the circuit. We use a single layer of entangling gates to factorize 36 numbers represented using 7, 8, and 9-qubit Hamiltonians. We also verify the method's performance by implementing it on the IBMQ Lima hardware to factorize 55, 65, 77 and 91 which are greater than the largest number (21) to have been factorized on IBMQ hardware.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据