4.7 Article

Retrieval of 3D information in X-ray dark-field imaging with a large field of view

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02960-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Karlsruhe Nano Micro Facility (KNMF), a Helmholtz Research Infrastructure at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
  2. European Research Council [AdG 695045]
  3. DFG [GRK 2274]
  4. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  5. Free State of Bavaria under the Excellence Strategy of the Federal Government and the Lander
  6. Technical University of Munich -Institute for Advanced Study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

X-ray dark-field imaging has been successfully used to retrieve 3D information for human thorax sized objects, with a method similar to classic tomography and tomosynthesis.
X-ray dark-field imaging is a widely researched imaging technique, with many studies on samples of very different dimensions and at very different resolutions. However, retrieval of three-dimensional (3D) information for human thorax sized objects has not yet been demonstrated. We present a method, similar to classic tomography and tomosynthesis, to obtain 3D information in X-ray -imaging. Here, the sample is moved through the divergent beam of a Talbot-Lau interferometer. Projections of features at different distances from the source seemingly move with different velocities over the detector, due to the cone beam geometry. The reconstruction of different focal planes exploits this effect. We imaged a chest phantom and were able to locate different features in the sample (e.g. the ribs, and two sample vials filled with water and air and placed in the phantom) to corresponding focal planes. Furthermore, we found that image quality and detectability of features is sufficient for image reconstruction with a dose of 68 mu Sv at an effective pixel size of 0.357 x 0.357 mm(2). Therefore, we successfully demonstrated that the presented method is able to retrieve 3D information in X-ray dark-field imaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据