4.7 Article

Characteristics and impact of aged coal ash with slag emplaced in a karst cave: the case of Divaska jama, Slovenia

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02842-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [P6-0119, P1-0255]
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of Republic of Slovenia [C3330-17-529033, Raziskovalci-2.0-ZAG-529033]
  3. Republic of Slovenia, Ministry of Education, Science and Sport
  4. European Regional Development Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mixture of coal bottom ash, slag, and fly ash placed in the cave may have harmful effects on the ecological environment and biota in the cave ecosystem. Thorough investigation should be carried out when removing these mixtures.
A mixture of coal bottom ash and slag, with a fraction of fly ash (CAFAS) from steam locomotives, was placed in the cave Divaska jama to delimit and level tourist trails. Emplacement began in 1914 and carried on for several decades. The CAFAS mixed with other cave material gradually changed its structure and appearance. Currently the concentration of some elements in the CAFAS (As, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, Zn), and also to a lesser extent in cave sediments (Cr, Cu, Ni), indicates a possibly harmful effect on sediment-associated biota based on ecotoxicological assays. Compared to the cave sediment, the CAFAS contains distinctly different mineral phases and presents a different source of radioactivity. Microbial metabolic activity of CAFAS is low, 0.22 mu l O-2/gDW h, but higher than that of cave sediment. The present environmental hazards from CAFAS are estimated to be low. Whereas the emplacement of CAFAS was seen initially a long-term solution for waste disposal and management of the cave, it turned out that CAFAS enriches the underground environment with inorganic and organic compounds and disperses pollution into the cave ecosystem. After its removal from the cave, the CAFAS should be investigated thoroughly due to its susceptibility to alteration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据