4.7 Article

Optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials in evaluation of optic chiasm decompression

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06097-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. program PROGRES [Q40/4, Q40/7]
  2. MH CZ-DRO (UHHK) [00179906]
  3. MH CZ [NV19-01-00435, NV18-06-00484]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the sensitivity of optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials to chiasmal compression and changes after decompression. The results revealed that motion-onset visual evoked potentials were more effective in detecting functional changes in the visual pathway.
Chiasmal compression is a known cause of visual impairment, often leading to surgical decompression of the optic chiasm (OC). A prospective study was held at University Hospital in Hradec Kralove to explore sensitivity of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to OC compression and eventual changes after a decompression. 16 patients with OC compression, caused by different sellar pathologies, were included. The main inclusion criterion was the indication for decompressive surgery. Visual acuity (VA), visual field (VF), retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness, and peak time and amplitude of pattern-reversal (P-VEPs) and motion-onset VEPs (M-VEPs) were measured pre- and postoperatively. The degree of OC compression was determined on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. For M-VEPs, there was a significant postoperative shortening of the peak time (N160) (p < 0.05). P100 peak time and its amplitude did not change significantly. The M-VEPs N160 amplitude showed a close relationship to the VF improvement. Thinner preoperative RNFL does not present a statistically important limiting factor for better functional outcomes. The morphological status of the sellar region should be taken into consideration when one evaluates the chiasmal syndrome. M-VEPs enable detection of functional changes in the visual pathway better than P-VEPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据