4.6 Article

Nanozymes with reductase-like activities: antioxidant properties and electrochemical behavior

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 2026-2035

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ra08127f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Ukraine [2020.02/0100, 2021.01/0010]
  2. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
  3. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine [0120U103398, 0121U109539, 0121U109543]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanozymes, as stable and cost-effective mimics of natural enzymes, have promising applications in food and environmental biotechnology, biosensors, alternative energy, and medicine. This research focused on the synthesis of metal-based Nanozymes via chemical methods and their antioxidant ability in solution. The most effective reductase-like Zn/Cd/Cu Nanozyme was characterized and shown to mimic selenite reductase. Additionally, an amperometric sensor with high sensitivity and a broad linear range for selenite ions was successfully constructed.
Nanozymes (NZs) as stable cost-effective mimics of natural enzymes may be promising catalysts in food and environmental biotechnology, biosensors, alternative energy and medicine. The majority of known NZs are mimetics of oxidoreductases, although there are only limited data regarding mimetics of reductases. In the present research, a number of metal-based NZs were synthesized via chemical methods and screened for their antioxidant ability in solution. The most effective reductase-like Zn/Cd/Cu NZ was characterized in detail. Its antioxidant properties in comparison with several food products and Trolox, as well as substrate specificity, size and composition were studied. Zn/Cd/Cu NZ was shown to mimic preferentially selenite reductase. The amperometric sensor was constructed possessing a high sensitivity (1700 A M-1 m(-2)) and a broad linear range (16-1000 mu M) for selenite ions. The possibility to apply the fabricated sensor for selenite determination in commercial mineral water has been demonstrated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据