4.6 Article

Separation of vanadium and tungsten from synthetic and spent catalyst leach solutions using an ion-exchange resin

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 3635-3645

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ra05253e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Korean Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Korean government (MOTIE) [20217510100020]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20217510100020] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the adsorption and desorption characteristics of vanadium and tungsten ions using a simple porous anion-exchange resin. The applicability and feasible reuse of the resin were tested by recovering both metals from real spent catalysts.
Vanadium and tungsten ion adsorption and desorption characteristics and separation conditions were investigated using a simple porous anion-exchange resin. Initially, systematic experimental research was performed using synthetic aqueous vanadium and tungsten solutions. To evaluate the vanadium and tungsten (50-500 mg L-1) isotherm parameters, adsorption was performed at pH 7.0 using 0.5 g of ion-exchange resin at 303 K for 24 h. Well-known adsorption models such as Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin were used. Vanadium was desorbed from the resin using HCl and NaOH solutions. In contrast, tungsten was not desorbed by the HCl solution, which enabled the separation of the two ions. The desorption reaction reached equilibrium within 30 min of its start, yielding over 90% desorption. We investigated the adsorption mechanism and resin stability with the aid of spectroscopic and microscopic analysis, as well as adsorption results. The applicability and feasibility of the resin was tested via recovery of both metals from real spent catalysts. The applicability and reusability results indicated that the resin can be used for more than five cycles with an efficacy of over 90%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据