4.7 Article

Assessment of the Cholesterol-Lowering Effect of MOMAST(R): Biochemical and Cellular Studies

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14030493

关键词

Cultivar Coratina; by-products; circular economy; cholesterol metabolism; PCSK9

资金

  1. BIOENUTRA S.R.L. (Italy)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MOMAST(R), derived from olive oil vegetation water, has been found to have a hypocholesterolemic effect by modulating LDLR/SREBP-2 and PCSK9 pathways. This study provides evidence for the potential use of MOMAST(R) as a new ingredient in the development of functional foods and/or nutraceuticals for cardiovascular disease prevention.
MOMAST(R) is a patented phenolic complex derived from the olive oil vegetation water, a by-product of the olive oil supply chain, in which hydroxytyrosol (OH-Tyr) and tyrosol (Tyr) and verbascoside are the main compounds. This study was aimed at investigating its hypocholesterolemic effect by assessing the ability to modulate the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR)/sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2 (SREBP-2), and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) pathways. MOMAST(R) inhibits the in vitro activity of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGC(O)AR) with a dose-response trend. After the treatment of HepG2 cells, MOMAST(R) increases the SREBP-2, LDLR, and HMGCoAR protein levels leading, from a functional point of view to an improved ability of hepatic cells to up-take LDL from the extracellular environment with a final cholesterol-lowering effect. Furthermore, MOMAST(R) decreased the PCSK9 protein levels and its secretion in the extracellular environment, presumably via the reduction of the hepatic nuclear factor 1-alpha (HNF1-alpha). The experiments were performed in parallel, using pravastatin as a reference compound. Results demonstrated that MOMAST(R) may be exploited as a new ingredient for the development of functional foods and/or nutraceuticals for cardiovascular disease prevention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据