4.7 Article

Vitamin D Status and Physical Activity during Wintertime in Forensic Inpatients-A Randomized Clinical Trial

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13103510

关键词

vitamin D status; physical activity; winter; supplements; randomized control trial

资金

  1. Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found a positive correlation between vitamin D status and physical activity, with higher physical activity levels in the Intervention group when controlling for BMI. A vitamin D status above 75 nmol/L appears to be an optimal level for physical activity.
This study aimed to gain deeper knowledge about the relationship between vitamin D and physical activity in a sample of forensic inpatients. Sixty-seven male forensic inpatients participated. Participants were randomly assigned into an Intervention group (vitamin D) or a Control group (placebo). The Physical Activity-Rating (PA-R) questionnaire was used to measure physical activity from January to May. Vitamin D status was measured as 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25-OHD) pre- and post-intervention. The results revealed that vitamin D status at post-test was positively correlated with physical activity, but there was no effect of vitamin D supplementation looking at the two randomized groups. However, controlling for body mass index (BMI), the results showed an effect of BMI and a main effect of groups with a higher level of physical activity in the Intervention group. No interaction effects were found. Participants were also assigned into High and Low vitamin D groups based on the vitamin D status at post-test; i.e., the upper (75.1 nmol/L) and lower quartile (46.7 nmol/L). T-tests revealed that participants with a vitamin D status above 75 nmol/L showed significantly higher levels of physical activity than participants with a vitamin D status below 46.7 nmol/L. Thus, a vitamin D status above 75 nmol/L seems to be an optimal level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据