4.7 Article

Parents' Experiences Regarding School Meals during the COVID-19 Pandemic

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13124211

关键词

school meals; catering allowance; food packs; parent; pandemic

资金

  1. program Implementation of fundamental research at Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies [G11]
  2. Faculty of Food Technology of Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The school catering allowance in the form of food packs was considered successful, with over 70% of respondents giving positive ratings, especially parents from Vidzeme and Latgale regions. Parents appreciated the support they received and felt it provided a sense of security during the crisis.
The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic required not only the reorientation of learning to remote form but also a change in the form of state-funded school lunches. One of the forms of school catering allowance was food packs, which obligated parents to prepare a warm lunch for the pupil from products included in food packs. As the responsibility for providing a warm lunch for the pupil was transferred to the parents, it was important to understand the parents' experience. The survey was used to gather parents' experiences of school catering allowance received during the pandemic using survey administration software-Google forms; 5166 respondents from different regions of Latvia took part in the survey. The school catering allowance in the form of food packs (83.7%) can be considered successful as over 70% of respondents rated it as positive, giving a rating of 7 (good) or above. Parents from Vidzeme and Latgale had the most positive experience with food packs. The parents appreciated the support they received, stating that it provided a certain sense of security during the crisis. Parental dissatisfaction was related to the composition of food packs, lack of local products and unacceptable products, such as canned meat and fish.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据