4.7 Article

Gut Microbiome Alterations following Postnatal Iron Supplementation Depend on Iron Form and Persist into Adulthood

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14030412

关键词

iron supplement; ferrous sulfate; ferrous bis-glycinate chelate; gut microbiome; metabolomics; rat model; infant nutrition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The gut microbiota is implicated in the adverse developmental outcomes of postnatal iron supplementation, and the form of iron can influence microbiota diversity and metabolite changes. Early iron provision can have long-term effects on the gut microbiota and microbial metabolism in adult rats.
The gut microbiota is implicated in the adverse developmental outcomes of postnatal iron supplementation. To generate hypotheses on how changes to the gut microbiota by iron adversely affect development, and to determine whether the form of iron influences microbiota outcomes, we characterized gut microbiome and metabolome changes in Sprague-Dawley rat pups given oral supplements of ferrous sulfate (FS), ferrous bis-glycinate chelate (FC), or vehicle control (CON) on postnatal day (PD) 2-14. Iron supplementation reduced microbiome alpha-diversity (p < 0.0001) and altered short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and trimethylamine (TMA) in a form-dependent manner. To investigate the long-term effects of iron provision in early life, an additional cohort was supplemented with FS, FC, or CON until PD 21 and then weaned onto standard chow. At similar to 8 weeks of age, young adult (YA) rats that received FS exhibited more diverse microbiomes compared to CON (p < 0.05), whereas FC microbiomes were less diverse (p < 0.05). Iron provision resulted in 10,000-fold reduced abundance of Lactobacilli in pre-weanling and YA animals provided iron in early life (p < 0.0001). Our results suggest that in pre-weanling rats, supplemental iron form can generate differential effects on the gut microbiota and microbial metabolism that persist into adulthood.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据