4.7 Article

Insight on Glucose and Fructose Absorption and Relevance in the Enterocyte Milieu

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14030517

关键词

fructose; glucose; enterocytes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the metabolism and absorption of glucose, fructose, and sucrose in enterocytes. The results suggest that fructose is taken up and catabolized more quickly than glucose, and the metabolism of these sugars differs in the cells. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and to explore specific transporters and enzymes involved in sugar metabolism.
Although epidemiological studies indicate a strong correlation between high sugar intake and metabolic diseases, the biological mechanisms underlying this link are still controversial. To further examine the modification and crosstalk occurring in enterocyte metabolism during sugar absorption, in this study we evaluate the diffusion and intestinal metabolism of glucose, fructose and sucrose, which were supplemented in equimolar concentration to Caco-2 cells grown on polyester membrane inserts. At different time points after supplementation, changes in metabolite concentration were evaluated in the apical and basolateral chambers by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and gas-chromatography (GC). Sucrose was only minimally hydrolyzed by Caco-2 cells. Upon supplementation, we observed a faster uptake of fructose than glucose, the pentose sugar being also faster catabolized. Monosaccharide absorption was concomitant to the synthesis/transport of other metabolites, which occurred differently in glucose and fructose supplemented cells. Our results confirm the prominent role of intestinal cells in fructose metabolism and clearance after absorption, representing a further step forward in the understanding of the role of dietary sugars. Future research, including targeted analysis on specific transporters/enzymes and the use of labeled substrates, will be helpful to confirm the present results and their interpretation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据