4.7 Article

Assessment of Glycemic Response to Model Breakfasts Varying in Glycemic Index (GI) in 5-7-Year-Old School Children

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13124246

关键词

post-prandial glycemic response (PPGR); cognition; children; Glycemic Index (GI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that substituting mid-high GI sugars with low GI sugars during breakfast is a viable strategy for sustained energy release and glycemic response in healthy children aged 5-7 years. This indicates that choosing low GI sugars like isomaltulose may be beneficial for cognitive performance and overall health in younger children.
Reduced Glycemic Index (GI) of breakfast has been linked to improved cognitive performance in both children and adult populations across the morning. However, few studies have profiled the post-prandial glycemic response (PPGR) in younger children. The aim of this study was to assess PPGR to breakfast interventions differing in GI in healthy children aged 5-7 years. Eleven subjects completed an open-label, randomized, cross-over trial, receiving three equicaloric test beverages (260 kcal) consisting of 125 mL semi-skimmed milk and 50 g sugar (either glucose, sucrose, or isomaltulose). On a fourth occasion, the sucrose beverage was delivered as intermittent supply. PPGR was measured over 180 min using Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM). The incremental area under the curve (3h-iAUC) was highest for the glucose beverage, followed by intermittent sucrose (-21%, p = 0.288), sucrose (-27%, p = 0.139), and isomaltulose (-48%, p = 0.018). The isomaltulose beverage induced the smallest Cmax (7.8 mmol/L vs. >9.2 mmol/L for others) and the longest duration with moderate glucose level, between baseline value and 7.8 mmol/L (150 vs. <115 min for others). These results confirm that substituting mid-high GI sugars (e.g., sucrose and glucose) with low GI sugars (e.g., isomaltulose) during breakfast are a viable strategy for sustained energy release and glycemic response during the morning even in younger children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据