4.4 Article

Impact of Annual Maximum Wind Speed in Mixed Wind Climates on Wind Hazard for Mainland China

期刊

NATURAL HAZARDS REVIEW
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000542

关键词

Extreme typhoon wind speed; Mixed wind climates; Extreme value analysis; Wind hazard map; China

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51808169]
  2. National Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) [RGPIN-201604814]
  3. University of Western Ontario

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A systematic analysis of typhoon and nontyphoon wind speeds in the coastal region of mainland China was conducted using wind records and historical typhoon tracks. The study identified regions where typhoon winds dominate the wind hazard and developed wind maps for mainland China.
The coastal region in mainland China is prone to typhoon winds. However, a systematic analysis of the annual maximum wind speed analysis for typhoon and nontyphoon winds (i.e., mixed wind climate) using the wind records has not been reported for the region. The wind hazard modeling and analysis for mainland China was carried out in the present study by using wind records from 839 meteorological stations and considering mixed wind climates. The identification of typhoon winds from wind records is based on historical typhoon tracks. Both the region of influence approach and the at-site approach were used to estimate the T-year return period value of the annual maximum wind speed, v(T), according to the wind-producing mechanism. The estimated v(T) for typhoon and nontyphoon winds was used to identify regions where typhoon winds dominate the wind hazard. Wind maps for mainland China were developed by combining wind hazards determined from a typhoon wind hazard model and wind records from meteorological stations to estimate v(T). A comparison of developed maps to that given in the Chinese structural design code is given. (C) 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据