4.8 Article

The meaning of net zero and how to get it right

期刊

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 15-21

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-021-01245-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Oxford's Strategic Research Fund
  2. ClimateWorks [191501]
  3. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/S008381/1]
  4. EU [869192, 869357]
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/V013106/1]
  6. ESRC [ES/S008381/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. NERC [NE/V013106/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The concept of net-zero carbon emissions is rooted in physical climate science but is operationalized through social, political, and economic systems. Seven critical attributes have been identified for the successful implementation of net zero, emphasizing the urgency of emission reductions, coverage of all emission sources, cautious use of carbon dioxide removals, and alignment with broader sustainable development objectives.
The concept of net-zero carbon emissions has emerged from physical climate science. However, it is operationalized through social, political and economic systems. We identify seven attributes of net zero, which are important to make it a successful framework for climate action. The seven attributes highlight the urgency of emission reductions, which need to be front-loaded, and of coverage of all emission sources, including currently difficult ones. The attributes emphasize the need for social and environmental integrity. This means carbon dioxide removals should be used cautiously and the use of carbon offsets should be regulated effectively. Net zero must be aligned with broader sustainable development objectives, which implies an equitable net-zero transition, socio-ecological sustainability and the pursuit of broad economic opportunities. Net-zero emissions is more than a concept of physical climate science. It is implemented in social, political and economic contexts. This Perspective proposes seven attributes that are critical for the practical and effective implementation of net zero.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据