4.6 Article

Fluoride Bio-Sorption Efficiency and Antimicrobial Potency of Macadamia Nut Shells

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15031065

关键词

antimicrobial potency; bio-sorption; chemisorption; fluoride; macadamia nut shells

资金

  1. Water Research Commission [K5/2363//3]
  2. Univen RPC Fund [SES/19/ERM/14]
  3. DHET Research Incentives [P118]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that macadamia nut shells have a good efficiency in the bio-sorption of fluoride and show potential for antimicrobial activity. The adsorption of fluoride by MNS was found to be a spontaneous and endothermic process.
This paper presents the potential application of macadamia nut shells (MNS) in the bio-sorption of fluoride and its antimicrobial potency against common pathogens encountered in surface water resources. The efficiency of MNS in the sorption of fluoride was determined using batch mode experiments, while the antimicrobial potency was investigated using the well disc diffusion assay method. The maximum fluoride sorption capacity of 1.26 mg/g was recorded at an initial fluoride concentration of 5 mg/L, adsorbent dosage of 0.5 g/100 mL, contact time of 120 min and initial pH of 6. The adsorption kinetics data were better described with a pseudo second order model, indicating the dominance of the chemisorption mechanisms. The Langmuir adsorption isotherm model described the isotherm data suggesting a monolayered adsorption. The thermodynamic parameters, increment Go and increment Ho, confirmed that F- sorption by MNS is a spontaneous and endothermic process. The bio-sorbent was regenerated for seven continuous cycles when HCl was used as regenerating solution. The antimicrobial studies revealed that MNS has minimal activity towards Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The MNS showed potentials for application in bio-sorption of fluoride. However, the doping of MNS with metal ions is recommended to enhance its anti-microbial potency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据