4.6 Article

Reversible Photo-, Thermal-, and pH-Responsive Functionalized Wood with Fluorescence Emission

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15031229

关键词

functional wood; photo-response; thermal-response; pH-response; fluorescence

资金

  1. Zhejiang University [245871]
  2. Ningbo MaterChem Technology Company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A high-performance functional wood with reversible photo-, thermal-, and pH-responsive properties and fluorescence has been prepared by introducing epoxy resin. The functional wood exhibits improved mechanical properties, multi-response and fluorescence functions, as well as enhanced water and corrosion resistance.
A reversible photo-, thermal-, and pH-responsive high-performance functional wood with fluorescence has been prepared. The properties, structure, multi-response, fluorescence, water resistance, and corrosion resistance of original wood (ORW) and functional wood (FUW) were investigated with an X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectrometer, a Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer, a N-2 adsorption-desorption analyzer, an atomic force microscope (AFM), tensile tests, a scanning electron microscope (SEM), an ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometer, a fluorescence spectrometer, the equilibrium swelling ratio (ESR), and corrosion tests. The results of XPS, FTIR, N-2 adsorption-desorption, and AFM exhibited that FUW was successfully prepared. Additionally, the results of the tensile test and SEM revealed that FUW had better mechanical properties than ORW, due to the filling of epoxy resin in the pores of the wood. Moreover, the UV-Vis and fluorescence spectra demonstrated that the introduction of epoxy resin induced multi-response and fluorescence functions to FUW. Furthermore, the data of ESR and corrosion test showed that the introduction of epoxy resin greatly improved the water and corrosion resistance of wood. This study provides ideas and methods for preparing novel high-performance multi-response FUW.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据