4.6 Article

SiC Fin-Shaped Gate Trench MOSFET with Integrated Schottky Diode

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14227096

关键词

silicon carbide (SiC) trench MOSFET; split P shield (SPS); fin-shaped gate; integrated SBD; transient extreme stress

资金

  1. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Power Transmission Technology [GEIRI-SKL-2019-008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proposed FS-TMOS features a fin-shaped gate and integrated Schottky diode design to improve performance, while utilizing the SPS shield to suppress excessive electric field. Compared to C-TMOS, FS-TMOS has significantly lower performance metrics and demonstrates superior robustness in short-circuit and avalanche tests. Overall, FS-TMOS is a promising candidate for next-generation high efficiency and high-power density applications.
A silicon carbide (SiC) trench MOSFET featuring fin-shaped gate and integrated Schottky barrier diode under split P type shield (SPS) protection (FS-TMOS) is proposed by finite element modeling. The physical mechanism of FS-TMOS is studied comprehensively in terms of fundamental (blocking, conduction, and dynamic) performance and transient extreme stress reliability. The fin-shaped gate on the sidewall of the trench and integrated Schottky diode at the bottom of trench aim to the reduction of gate charge and improvement on the third quadrant performance, respectively. The SPS region is fully utilized to suppress excessive electric field both at trench oxide and Schottky contact when OFF-state. Compared with conventional trench MOSFET (C-TMOS), the gate charge, Miller charge, V-on at third quadrant, R-on,R-sp & BULL;Q(gd), and R-on,R-sp & BULL;Q(g) of FS-TMOS are significantly reduced by 34%, 20%, 65%, 0.1%, and 14%, respectively. Furthermore, short-circuit and avalanche capabilities are discussed, verifying the FS-TMOS is more robust than C-TMOS. It suggests that the proposed FS-TMOS is a promising candidate for next-generation high efficiency and high-power density applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据