4.6 Article

A Comparative Study of the Mechanical Properties of FDM 3D Prints Made of PLA and Carbon Fiber-Reinforced PLA for Thin-Walled Applications

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14227062

关键词

3D printing; FDM; carbon fibers; polymers

资金

  1. Faculty of Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering of the Kielce University of Technology [01.0.09.00/2.01.01.00.0000 SUBB.MKTM.21.001-Analysis]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research focused on analyzing the mechanical properties of thin-walled specimens fabricated using Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM), showing that the properties of thin-walled elements vary significantly depending on thickness.
This study focused on the analysis of the mechanical properties of thin-walled specimens fabricated by fused deposition modelling (FDM). Two materials were considered, i.e., polylactide (PLA) and polylactide with carbon fiber (PLA-CF). The article describes how the specimens with different thicknesses and printing orientations were designed, printed, measured to assess their geometric and dimensional accuracy, subjected to tensile testing, and examined using scanning electron microscopy. The data provided here can be used for further research aimed at improving filament deposition and modifying the base material by combining it with different components, for example carbon fiber. The investigations revealed that the properties of thin-walled elements produced by FDM varied significantly depending on the thickness. So far, this problem has not been investigated extensively. Research by analyzing the key parameter, which is the direction of printing that is important for thin-walled models, provides a lot of new information for designers and technologists and opens the way to further extended scientific research in the field of the strength analysis of thin-walled models produced by 3D printing, which is very applicable to structure optimization in the era of the industrial revolution 4.0 and progress in the LEAN manufacturing process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据