4.6 Article

Hybridization Effects on Bending and Interlaminar Shear Strength of Composite Laminates

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15041302

关键词

Polymer-Matrix Composites (PMCs); hybridization; mechanical properties; mechanical testing

资金

  1. national funds through FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [UIDB/00285/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fiber-reinforced composites are gradually replacing traditional materials in engineering applications, but their lack of toughness makes them unsuitable for some applications. Hybridization, combining different types of fibers, can improve the mechanical properties. The study found an ideal fiber content that maximizes both properties and recommends specific placement of fibers based on their type.
Fiber-reinforced composites are gradually replacing the traditional materials in many engineering applications. However, for many applications these materials are still unsuitable, due to their lack of toughness. In this context, hybridization is a promising strategy in which two or more types of fiber are combined to obtain a better balance of mechanical properties compared to non-hybrid composites. Therefore, the main goal of this work is to study the hybridization effect on the static performance and interlaminar shear strength. For this purpose, carbon, glass, and Kevlar fibers were used and combined in different proportions. It was possible to conclude that there is an ideal value of fiber content to maximize both properties and, depending on the type of fiber, they should be placed specifically on the compression or tensile side. For example, for composites involving carbon and glass fibers the latter must be placed on the compression side, and for a value of 17% by weight the flexural strength decreases by only 2.8% and the bending modulus by around 19.8%. On the other hand, when Kevlar fibers are combined with glass or carbon fibers, the Kevlar ones must always be placed on the tensile side and with an ideal value of 13% by weight.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据