4.6 Article

A Simple Method of Evaluating the Thermal Properties of Metallurgical Cokes under High Temperature

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14195767

关键词

coke; tumbling strength; reactivity index; optical texture

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21875141, U1760119]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [19DZ2271100]
  3. Shanghai Scientific and Technological Innovation Project [19JC1410400]
  4. Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [2019-01-07-00-07-E00015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research found that the weight loss and tumbling strength of coke are influenced by temperature and gas composition, with significant variations in properties of different cokes at 1300 degrees C, closely related to optical texture.
The reactivity index of weight loss (RI) and tumbling strength after the reaction (I-10(600)) of manufacturing coke were first tested at a temperature series of 1100, 1200, and 1300 degrees C under CO2 atmosphere with different compositions and duration times to study the effects of temperature, time, and gas composition on coke hot strength. Then the RI/I-10(600), carbon structure, and optical texture of the cokes prepared from different single coals were mainly studied after a solution reaction with CO2 under a high temperature of 1300 degrees C and a standard temperature of 1100 degrees C. It was found that temperature greatly affects the RI/I-10(600) of coke, especially at high temperatures up to 1300 degrees C. Compared with standard tests under 1100 degrees C, the changes of RI/I-10(600) for different cokes are very different at 1300 degrees C, and the changes are greatly related to coke optical texture. Under a high temperature in the testing method, the tumbling strength of cokes with more isotropy increased, whereas it decreased for those with less isotropy. This simple method of using high temperature could yield the same results when compared with complicated simulated blast furnace conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据