4.6 Review

Support-Activity Relationship in Heterogeneous Catalysis for Biomass Valorization and Fine-Chemicals Production

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14226796

关键词

structure-activity relationship; single-atom catalysis; green synthesis; supported metals; high-added value products

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heterogeneous catalysts are expanding their applications from traditional industrial chemistry to the production of fine chemicals, with a focus on reducing the use of fossil feedstocks. Biomasses, as the most accessible source of organic precursors, require novel catalysts for efficient utilization, while the importance of supports in ensuring stable performance and improving catalytic activity should not be overlooked.
Heterogeneous catalysts are progressively expanding their field of application, from high-throughput reactions for traditional industrial chemistry with production volumes reaching millions of tons per year, a sector in which they are key players, to more niche applications for the production of fine chemicals. These novel applications require a progressive utilization reduction of fossil feedstocks, in favor of renewable ones. Biomasses are the most accessible source of organic precursors, having as advantage their low cost and even distribution across the globe. Unfortunately, they are intrinsically inhomogeneous in nature and their efficient exploitation requires novel catalysts. In this process, an accurate design of the active phase performing the reaction is important; nevertheless, we are often neglecting the importance of the support in guaranteeing stable performances and improving catalytic activity. This review has the goal of gathering and highlighting the cases in which the supports (either derived or not from biomass wastes) share the worth of performing the catalysis with the active phase, for those reactions involving the synthesis of fine chemicals starting from biomasses as feedstocks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据