4.6 Article

Bond Tests on Clay Bricks and Natural Stone Masonry Externally Bonded with FRP

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14237439

关键词

masonry; FRP; bond; Lecce stone; clay brick; mortar joint; effective bond length

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the use of Fiber-Reinforced Polymers (FRP) for strengthening existing buildings, analyzes the impact of various parameters on the bond behavior of the strengthening system, and provides a detailed discussion of the results of shear tests conducted on different types of masonry substrates and FRP reinforcements.
Nowadays, the solution of durability problems of existing buildings has a key role in civil engineering, in which there is an ever-increasing need for building restorations. Over the past 50 years, there is a growing interest in a new composite material, fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP), suitable for increasing the resistance and the stability of existing buildings and, consequently, for extending their service life. In this context, the effectiveness of the strengthening system is related to the bond behaviour that is influenced by several parameters such as bond length, the stiffness of the reinforcement, the mechanical properties of the substrate, environmental conditions, etc. This paper aims to analyse the main experimental results from shear tests performed on two kinds of masonry substrates and different types of FRP reinforcements. The purpose is to highlight the role played by many parameters to the bond behaviour of these systems: the mechanical properties of substrates; the stiffness of reinforcements; the type of supports (i.e., unit or masonry unit). The obtained experimental results underlined that the specimens realised with masonry unit show an increase in debonding load and different stress transfer mechanisms along the bonded length with respect to the specimens with a unit substrate. The analysis of the data revealed that the presence of mortar joints cannot be neglected because it influences the interface global performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据