4.6 Article

Computational Modelling of VIG Plates Using FEM: Static and Dynamic Analysis

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15041467

关键词

plate; finite element method; dynamic analysis; static analysis; vacuum insulated glass

资金

  1. Polish Minister of Education and Science [SKN/SP/496315/2021]
  2. PL-Grid Infrastructure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the impact of different parameters on the mechanical properties of VIG panels and found that the material and geometrical characteristics of the pillars are crucial for both static and dynamic responses. Further research opportunities were proposed.
Vacuum insulated glass (VIG) panels are becoming more and more popular due to their good thermal performance. Little information about the mechanical or strength parameters, which are crucial for the durability of a window, might be found in the published papers. The purpose of this work was to analyse the impact of different parameters on VIG panels' mechanical properties. Parameter diversity refers to both geometrical and material characteristics. Static and dynamic analyses using the finite element method (ABAQUS program) were conducted. In addition, 101 various numerical models, created with the use of Python language, were tested. The changes of geometrical parameters were made with constant material parameters and the reverse. It has been concluded that pillars' material and geometrical properties are crucial considering not only the static response of the VIG plates, but also the dynamic one. Moreover, it was proven that getting rid of the first row of pillars near every edge seal led to an increase in deflection of the glass panes. Additionally, considering results for dynamic response associated with out-of-phase vibrations, spacing between support pillars should be large enough in order to avoid possible damage to the glass pane due to rapidly decreasing distance between them. Further research opportunities have been described.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据