4.5 Article

Drought monitoring and prediction using SPI, SPEI, and random forest model in various climates of Iran

期刊

JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 383-406

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wcc.2021.287

关键词

drought indices; drought monitoring; drought prediction; random forest

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to select the best model to predict SPI and SPEI in the next time, finding variations in their correlation under different climate conditions. By using the random forest model and various lag times for drought prediction, it was discovered that SPEI is more suitable for drought forecasting compared to SPI.
The aim of this study is to select the best model (combination of different lag times) for predicting the standardized precipitation index (SPI) and the standardized precipitation and evapotranspiration index (SPEI) in next time. Monthly precipitation and temperature data from 1960 to 2019 were used. In temperate climates, such as the north of Iran, the correlation coefficient of SPI and SPEI was 0.94, 0.95, and 0.81 at the time scales of 3, 12, and 48 months, respectively. Besides, this correlation coefficient was 0.47, 0.35, and 0.44 in arid and hot climates, such as the southwest of Iran because potential evapotranspiration (PET) depends on temperature more than rainfall. Drought was predicted using the random forest (RF) model and applying 1-12 months lag times for next time. By increasing of time scale, the prediction accuracy of SPI and SPEI will improve. The ability of SPEI is more than SPI for drought prediction, because the overall accuracy (OA) of prediction will increase, and the errors (i.e., overestimate (OE) and underestimate (UE)) will reduce. It is recommended for future studies (1) using wavelet analysis for improving accuracy of predictions and (2) using the Penman-Monteith method if ground-based data are available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据