期刊
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106168
关键词
Risk-prediction; Benchmarking; Quality improvement; Emergency general surgery
类别
资金
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Research of Alicante (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain [BOLA00060]
This study provides clinically-based benchmark values in Emergency General Surgery (EGS) and identifies measures for improvement, which can guide future medical practices.
Background and aims: Emergency General Surgery (EGS) conditions account for millions of deaths worldwide, yet it is practiced without benchmarking-based quality improvement programs. The aim of this observational, prospective, multicenter, nationwide study was to determine the best benchmark cutoff points in EGS, as a reference to guide improvement measures. Methods: Over a 6-month period, 38 centers (5% of all public hospitals) attending EGS patients on a 24-h, 7-days a week basis, enrolled consecutive patients requiring an emergent/urgent surgical procedure. Patients were stratified into cohorts of low (i.e., expected morbidity risk <33%), middle and high risk using the novel m-LUCENTUM calculator. Results: A total of 7258 patients were included; age (mean +/- SD) was 51.1 +/- 21.5 years, 43.2% were female. Benchmark cutoffs in the low-risk cohort (5639 patients, 77.7% of total) were: use of laparoscopy >= 40.9%, length of hospital stays <= 3 days, any complication within 30 days <= 17.7%, and 30-day mortality <= 1.1%. The variables with the greatest impact were septicemia on length of hospital stay (21 days; adjusted beta coefficient 16.8; 95% CI: 15.3 to 18.3; P < .001), and respiratory failure on mortality (risk-adjusted population attributable fraction 44.6%, 95% CI 29.6 to 59.6, P < .001). Use of laparoscopy (odds ratio 0.764, 95% CI 0.678 to 0.861; P < .001), and intraoperative blood loss (101-500 mL: odds ratio 2.699, 95% CI 2.152 to 3.380; P < .001; and 500-1000 mL: odds ratio 2.875, 95% CI 1.403 to 5.858; P = .013) were associated with increased morbidity. Conclusions: This study offers, for the first time, clinically-based benchmark values in EGS and identifies measures for improvement.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据