4.7 Article

Practical Multi-Keyword and Boolean Search Over Encrypted E-mail in Cloud Server

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SERVICES COMPUTING
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 1877-1889

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TSC.2019.2903502

关键词

Servers; Electronic mail; Encryption; Keyword search; Databases; Searchable encryption; boolean query; conjunctive search; multi-keyword search; encrypted e-mail

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61872412]
  2. Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2014A030308006]
  3. Guangdong Provincial Project of Science and Technology [2016B090920081]
  4. Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program [JCYJ20170413114215614]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a practical PEKS scheme named PMSEHS that allows email receivers to perform multi-keyword and boolean search in encrypted email database efficiently while protecting their privacy in the cloud server. Comparative experiments show that the scheme is more efficient in multi-keyword search for encrypted emails.
With the outbreak of e-mail message leakage events, such as the Hillary Clinton's Email Controversy, privacy and security of sensitive e-mail information have become users' primary concern. Encrypted email seems to be a viable solution for providing security, but it will greatly limit their operations. Public encryption with keyword search (PEKS) scheme is a popular technology to incorporate security protection and favorable operability functions together, which can play an important role in searching over encrypted email in a cloud server. In this paper, we propose a practical PEKS scheme named as public-key multi-keyword searchable encryption with hidden structures (PMSEHS). It could enable e-mail receivers to do the multi-keyword and boolean search in the large encrypted email database as fast as possible, without revealing more information to the cloud server. We also give comparative experiments, which demonstrate that our scheme has a higher efficiency in multi-keyword search for encrypted emails.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据