4.7 Article

Efficient Verification of Edge Data Integrity in Edge Computing Environment

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SERVICES COMPUTING
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 3233-3244

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TSC.2021.3090173

关键词

Edge data integrity; edge computing; service vendor; privacy-protection

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP180100212, DP200102491]
  2. Australian Research Council [DP200102491] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Verifying data integrity in the edge computing environment is crucial for security, but faces challenges due to high computational costs. The ICL-EDI scheme helps service vendors efficiently inspect and localize corrupted edge data, enhancing overall security.
The new edge computing paradigm extends cloud computing by allowing service vendors to deploy their service instances and data on distributed edge servers to serve their service users in close geographic proximity to those edge servers. Caching edge data on edge servers profoundly reduces the retrieval latency perceived by users. However, these edge data are subject to corruption due to intentional and/or accidental exceptions. This is a major challenge for service vendors but has been overlooked. Thus, verifying the integrity of edge data accurately and efficiently is a critical security problem in the edge computing environment. A unique characteristic of the edge computing environment is that edge servers suffer from constrained computing capacities. Thus, verifying data integrity on massive edge servers individually is computationally expensive and impractical. In this paper, we tackle this Edge Data Integrity (EDI) problem with an inspection and corruption localization scheme for EDI named ICL-EDI. This scheme allows service vendors to inspect data integrity and localize corrupted edge data cached on multiple edge servers accurately and efficiently. To evaluate its performance, we implement ICL-EDI and conduct extensive experiments to demonstrate its effectiveness and efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据