4.4 Review

Implicit Cognition Tests for the Assessment of Suicide Risk: a Systematic Review

期刊

CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REPORTS
卷 24, 期 2, 页码 141-159

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11920-022-01316-5

关键词

Suicide; Suicide attempt; Suicide ideation; Implicit; Cognition; Assessment

资金

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [ISCIII PI13/02200, PI16/01852, CM19/00026]
  2. American Foundation for Suicide Prevention [LSRG-1-005-16]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation [RTI2018099655B-I00, TEC2017-92552-EXP]
  4. regional government of Madrid [Y2018/TCS-4705, PEJD-2018-PRE/SAL8417]
  5. European Social Fund through the Operational Program on Youth Employment
  6. Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) [PEJD-2018-PRE/SAL8417]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article systematically reviews the validity and reliability of implicit tests for assessing suicide risk. The findings suggest that these measures are generally effective in assessing past and future suicidal thoughts and behaviors, with statistically significant results in retrospective and prospective associations.
Purpose of Review Suicide risk assessment is a challenge in clinical practice. Implicit measures may present with advantages with respect to explicit methods, and therefore may be useful for the assessment of suicide risk. We conducted a systematic review of 2 databases (PubMed and EMBASE) about implicit tests that measure suicide risk to explore their validity and reliability. Recent Findings Initial research revealed 321 articles. After the selection process, 31 articles were included in the review. The most death-related implicit cognition test used was the Death/Suicide Implicit association test (D/S IAT), followed by the Suicide Stroop Task. The Suicide Affect Misattribution Procedure (S-AMP) and the Death version of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (D-IRAP) were also used. Summary We found that the measures reviewed were generally valid for the assessment of past and future suicidal thoughts and behaviors, with statistically significant results regarding retrospective and prospective associations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据