Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in older patients: a propensity score matching analysis

Background The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) requiring surgical treatment in older patients has been continuously increasing. This study aimed to examine the safety and feasibility of performing laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) versus open liver resection (OLR) for HCC in older patients at a Japanese institution. Methods Between January 2010 and June 2021, 133 and 145 older patients (aged >= 70 years) who were diagnosed with HCC underwent LLR and OLR, respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis with covariates of baseline characteristics was performed. The intraoperative and postoperative data were evaluated in both groups. Results After PSM, 75 patients each for LLR and OLR were selected and the data compared. No significant differences in demographic characteristics, clinical data, and operative times were observed between the groups, although less than 10% of cases in each group underwent a major resection. Blood loss (OLR: 370 mL, LLR: 50 mL; P < 0.001) was lower, and the length of postoperative hospital stay (OLR: 12 days, LLR: 7 days; P < 0.001) and time to start of oral intake (OLR: 2 days, LLR: 1 day; P < 0.001) were shorter in the LLR group than in the OLR group. The incidence of complications >= Clavien-Dindo class IIIa was similar between the two groups. Conclusions LLR, especially minor resections, is safely performed and feasible for selected older patients with HCC.

Automated summary

This study compares the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) versus open liver resection (OLR) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in older patients. The results show that LLR is safe and feasible for selected older patients with HCC, with less blood loss and shorter postoperative hospital stay.