4.5 Article

Low-dose aspirin for primary prevention of adverse pregnancy outcomes in twin pregnancies: an observational cohort study based on propensity score matching

期刊

BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04217-2

关键词

Low-dose aspirin; Twin pregnancy; Preeclampsia; Preterm birth; Fetal growth restriction; Postpartum hemorrhage

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1002900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81520108013, 81771613, 81671488, 81871189, 82071675]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the use of low-dose aspirin in twin pregnancies significantly reduced the risk of preeclampsia and preterm birth, with possible benefits in lowering the rate of small for gestational age babies. Furthermore, the use of low-dose aspirin did not increase the risk of postpartum hemorrhage.
Background: Since the effectiveness of low-dose aspirin (LDA) in twin pregnancies is uncertain, we aimed to preliminarily assess whether LDA is beneficial in preventing preeclampsia in twin pregnancies. Methods: This study is an observational study in two hospitals in China. Among 932 women, 277 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were routinely treated with aspirin (100 mg daily) from 12 to 16weeks to 35 weeks of gestational age, while 655 in Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children were not taking aspirin during pregnancy. We followed each subject and the individual details were recorded. Results: LDA significantly reduced the risk of preeclampsia (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.24-0.95) and preterm birth 34 weeks (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.29-0.86) and showed possible benefits to lower the rate of SGA babies (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.55-1.00). Moreover, the risk of postpartum hemorrhage was not increased by LDA (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.35-2.26). Conclusions: Treatment with low-dose aspirin in twin pregnancies could offer some protection against adverse pregnancy outcomes in the absence of significantly increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据