4.3 Review

The recurrence of prolactinoma after withdrawal of dopamine agonist: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

BMC ENDOCRINE DISORDERS
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12902-021-00889-1

关键词

Prolactinoma; Dopamine agonist; Cabergoline; Bromocriptine; Recurrence; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China for Young Scholars [81702479]
  2. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2020A151501281]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Jiangmen, China [2018630100110019805]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed a very low recurrence rate of prolactinomas after withdrawal of DAs, with a recurrence proportion of 2%. More prospective studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are encouraged to confirm this finding.
Background: Prolactinoma is the major cause of hyperprolactinemia, and dopamine agonists (DAs) are generally the first-line treatment for them. Several studies have reviewed the recurrent rate of hyperprolactinemia after DAs withdrawal. However, few of them have concerned the recurrence risk of prolactinoma following the withdrawal of DAs. Methods: Three medical databases, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library, were retrieved up to February, 14, 2021 to identify studies related to recurrence of prolactinoma and withdrawal of DAs. Statistical analyses including meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, meta-regression, funnel plot and Egger test were performed through software R. Results: A total of 3225 studies were retrieved from the three data bases, and 13 studies consisted of 616 patients and 19 arms were finally included in this systematic analysis. There was no significant heterogeneity among the included studies, and fixed effect model was thus used. The pooled recurrence proportion of prolactinoma after withdrawal of DA was 2% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1-3%. Conclusion: Our study showed a very low recurrent rate of prolactinomas after DAs withdrawal. Much more prospective studies with larger cases and longer follow-up period are encouraged to confirm our finding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据