4.3 Article

Prognostication in Poststroke Aphasia: Perspectives of Significant Others of People With Aphasia on Receiving Information About Recovery

期刊

出版社

AMER SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOC
DOI: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00170

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [1104194]
  2. Research Training Program scholarship
  3. NHMRC [1175821]
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1104194, 1175821] Funding Source: NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the perceptions and preferences of significant others of people with aphasia on receiving prognostic information. The findings suggest that their perspectives are influenced by the poststroke reality and may inadvertently shape the views of the person with aphasia. It highlights the importance of considering the needs of significant others in prognostication practices to facilitate recovery.
Purpose: Knowing what to expect poststroke is important for many significant others of people with aphasia, yet an understanding of their perceptions and preferences in receiving prognostic information is limited. This knowledge is needed to inform the formulation and delivery of aphasia prognoses as conversations about prognosis can be harmful or helpful depending on their alignment with key stakeholder perspectives. Our preliminary study sought insight into the perspectives of significant others of people with aphasia on receiving prognostic information, with an aim toward informing evidence-based practice in aphasia prognostication. Method: We interviewed seven significant others of people with aphasia, 3-12 months poststroke. The interviews were semistructured, conducted one-to-one, and analyzed qualitatively using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Five themes were drawn from the interviews: (a) You don't know what you don't know. (b) Having them alive is the best you can ask for. (c) Recovery in the eye of the beholder. (d) Outcomes don't matter unless they help me help them. (e) It's my prognosis too if I'm living with aphasia. Conclusions: A significant other's prognosis-related perceptions and preferences are products of their poststroke reality and may inadvertently shape that of the person with aphasia. In order to facilitate recovery, prognostication practices need to consider the needs of significant others both as providers of care and as requiring care themselves for their first-hand experiences of third-party disability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据