4.8 Article

Chemical Design Rules for Non-Fullerene Acceptors in Organic Solar Cells

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 11, 期 44, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202102363

关键词

design rules; donor-acceptor interface; non-fullerene acceptors; organic solar cells

资金

  1. European Union [844655]
  2. KAUST Office of Sponsored Research (OSR) [OSR-2018-CARF/CCF-3079, OSR-CRG2018-3746]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [SPP 2196, 460766640]
  4. Swiss NSF Early Postdoc Mobility fellowship [P2ELP2_195156]
  5. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [844655] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P2ELP2_195156] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efficiencies of organic solar cells have been greatly improved by the development of non-fullerene acceptors (NFAs) and by analyzing the inhomogeneous electrostatic fields at the donor-acceptor interface. It is suggested that a molecular quadrupole moment of around 75 Debye angstrom can balance the trade-offs between open circuit voltage losses and gains in charge generation efficiency in PCE10:NFA solar cells.
Efficiencies of organic solar cells have practically doubled since the development of non-fullerene acceptors (NFAs). However, generic chemical design rules for donor-NFA combinations are still needed. Such rules are proposed by analyzing inhomogeneous electrostatic fields at the donor-acceptor interface. It is shown that an acceptor-donor-acceptor molecular architecture, and molecular alignment parallel to the interface, results in energy level bending that destabilizes the charge transfer state, thus promoting its dissociation into free charges. By analyzing a series of PCE10:NFA solar cells, with NFAs including Y6, IEICO, and ITIC, as well as their halogenated derivatives, it is suggested that the molecular quadrupole moment of approximate to 75 Debye angstrom balances the losses in the open circuit voltage and gains in charge generation efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据