4.8 Article

A Universal Additive Strategy to Reshape Electrolyte Solvation Structure toward Reversible Zn Storage

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 12, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202103231

关键词

electrolyte additives; N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone; organic carbonyl compounds; solvation structure regulation; zinc-ion batteries

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Singapore, under its MOE tier2 grant [MOE2019-T2-1-181]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adding carbonyl-containing organic solvents can enhance the reversibility of zinc-ion batteries and improve their cycling stability and capacity retention.
The benefits of Zn, despite many of its performance advantages (e.g., high theoretical capacity and low redox potential), are compromised by severe side reactions and Zn dendrite growth in aqueous electrolytes, due to the coordinated H2O within the Zn2+-solvation sheath and reactive free water in the bulk electrolyte. Unlike most efforts focused on costly super-concentrated electrolytes and single additive species, a universal strategy is proposed to boost Zn reversibility in dilute electrolytes via adding carbonyl-containing organic solvents. Based on experimental investigations and multiscale simulations, the representative electrolyte with a N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone polar additive is proved to assist in structural reshaping of Zn2+-solvation and stabilizing the hydrogen bond network of water. This synergy is instrumental in contributing to suppressed water-induced parasitic reactions and dendrite formation, which enables high average coulombic efficiency of 99.7% over 1000 cycles in an Zn/Cu asymmetric cell, and an ultralong cycling lifespan of 2000 cycles with 99.4% capacity retention in a Zn/VS2@SS full cell. Even with an elevated cathodic mass loading (up to 9.5 mg cm(-2)), the cycling stability is still maintained. The proposed strategy provides new insight into electrolyte additive design and sheds light on high-performance Zn-ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据