4.6 Article

Microstructure and Corrosion Resistance of Plasma Electrolytic Oxidized Recycled Mg Alloy

期刊

ACTA METALLURGICA SINICA-ENGLISH LETTERS
卷 35, 期 6, 页码 961-974

出版社

CHINESE ACAD SCIENCES, INST METAL RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1007/s40195-021-01324-z

关键词

Recycled Mg; Plasma electrolytic oxidation; Corrosion resistance; Layered structure

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province, China [2020CFB295]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52001128]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019KFYXJJS068]
  4. Innovative Foundation of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [2021JYCXJJ023]
  5. Innovation and Talent Recruitment Base of New Energy Chemistry and Device [B21003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study conducted a novel PEO process on recycled Mg alloy with a high content of Al, resulting in a polycrystalline PEO coating with a three-layered structure. Experimental results show that the PEO coating significantly enhances the corrosion resistance of recycled Mg alloy.
The wide application of Mg is hindered by its low corrosion resistance, especially for recycled Mg. In this work, a novel plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) process was conducted on a recycled Mg alloy with a high content of Al (similar to 2.3 wt%), which results in a polycrystalline PEO coating. The PEO coating displays a three-layered structure with a uniform elemental distribution. Unlike the outer layer decorated by channels of micrometre scales, the middle layer mainly contains submicron-sized pores associated with plasma discharges, whereas the fine pores originated from oxygen evolution were detected in the inner layer. The electrochemical measurements, hydrogen evolution tests and salt spray tests were conducted, indicating the superior corrosion resistance of PEO-coated recycled Mg alloy. Hence, the purposed PEO method could dramatically enhance the corrosion resistance of recycled Mg, which may broaden its application in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据