4.8 Article

High resolution global spatiotemporal assessment of rooftop solar photovoltaics potential for renewable electricity generation

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25720-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under the SFI-NSFC Partnership Programme [17/NSFC/5181]
  3. H2020 European Commission Project 'PARIS REINFORCE' [820846]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilizes machine learning and geospatial analysis to conduct a high-resolution global assessment of rooftop solar photovoltaics potential, revealing its distribution and cost implications worldwide.
Though a global assessment of rooftop solar photovoltaic (RTSPV) technology's potential and the cost is needed to estimate its impact, existing methods demand extensive data processing. Here, the authors report a machine learning method to realize a high-resolution global assessment of RTSPV potential. Rooftop solar photovoltaics currently account for 40% of the global solar photovoltaics installed capacity and one-fourth of the total renewable capacity additions in 2018. Yet, only limited information is available on its global potential and associated costs at a high spatiotemporal resolution. Here, we present a high-resolution global assessment of rooftop solar photovoltaics potential using big data, machine learning and geospatial analysis. We analyse 130 million km(2) of global land surface area to demarcate 0.2 million km(2) of rooftop area, which together represent 27 PWh yr(-1) of electricity generation potential for costs between 40-280 $ MWh(-1). Out of this, 10 PWh yr(-1) can be realised below 100 $ MWh(-1). The global potential is predominantly spread between Asia (47%), North America (20%) and Europe (13%). The cost of attaining the potential is lowest in India (66 $ MWh(-1)) and China (68 $ MWh(-1)), with USA (238 $ MWh(-1)) and UK (251 $ MWh(-1)) representing some of the costliest countries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据